RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00490
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code 6H (Pending Discharge Involuntary) be
changed to a code which will allow reentry into the Air National
Guard.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His current RE code was based on the fact he did not have a
valid Security Clearance; which caused him to not be world-wide
deployable.
In support of his request, he submits Special Order P-002926,
dated 18 Dec 13, and NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and
Record of Service. He highlights block #17 and #26, which
states he has a Secret clearance dated 29 Aug 13.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Air National Guard on 29 Sep 04.
On 26 Aug 13, the applicant was furnished a Honorable discharge,
and was credited with 8 years, 10 months, and 28 days.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an
error or an injustice. The applicant was unable to secure a
security clearance. His commander allowed him to obtain the
necessary clearance; however, his clearance was denied by the
Air Force Central Adjudicating Facility (AFCAF). Based on that
fact, the unit began administrative actions to separate him and
he was involuntarily discharged. The NGB finds his RE code
appropriate. However, NGB/A1PP recommends if the member has
resolved the issue regarding his security clearance, he should
contact a recruiter and request a waiver to his RE code to
reenlist in the military.
A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 15 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-00490 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 14 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Mar 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04732
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04732 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Specifically, he was told by his counsel at the time not to address the political conditions that surrounded the fight between the local MPF and his unit at the time. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant has not provided any evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00027
On 20 Nov 13, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-3. As such, he was never eligible for promotion to the grade of E-3, effective 21 Jun 13, as requested. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues a change to the FY13, R&R Initiatives added his AFSC 2T2X1 to the critical skills AFSC list, effective 1 Oct 12, as verified through his Force Support Squadron (FSS).
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00781
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00781 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry code 6A be changed to a code that will allow reentry into the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01432 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H (Pending Discharge-Involuntary) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01614
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6U (Not selected for reentry by the commander) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00614
Giving the circumstances surrounding the reason for his separation coupled with his honorable service characterization, we believe that a good probability exists that he may be able to provide effective and meaningful service to our nation as a member of the armed forces. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 10, he was discharged with a RE code of 3K (Secretarial Authority). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial of the applicants request for active duty service credit. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00592
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 6H (Pending Discharge - Involuntary) be corrected. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant's military personnel records, he initially entered the Air National Guard on 4 Aug 11. Therefore, we recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02601
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, Table 1.5, if an applicant is non-prior service (NPS), the term of...